Blast injures two in Afghanistan’s Takhar province
Khaama: Provincial security officials confirmed the incident. The blast unfolded within the third security district of Taloqan, as said in an official statement by the provincial security officials. This incident followed closely on the heels of another explosion in Khost province two days earlier, resulting in the loss of three lives and seven others wounded due to its significant impact. The victims comprised both Waziristan refugees and Khost residents, illustrating the indiscriminate nature of the incident. Click here to read more (external link).
The False Sense of Security Provided by the Taliban

Taliban fighters (file photo)
8am: The Taliban is engaging in daily arrests, torture, and assassinations of former military and government personnel, civil activists, journalists, and women who protest. They have imposed severe restrictions on the lives of citizens, effectively waging an ongoing war against the people of Afghanistan. Click here to read more (external link).
Afghans Waiting to Resettle in US Have Priority Under This Program

Aline Barros
VOA News
August 16, 2023
WASHINGTON — Two years ago, when the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan, the U.S. Embassy in Kabul closed and the U.S. military evacuated more than 100,000 Afghans in a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.
A significant number of evacuees who worked for the U.S. government during the war are still going through immigration proceedings to allow them to permanently live in the United States.
For those still waiting in third countries, if they have an immediate family member who has legal U.S. status, that person can petition to have their relative resettle in the U.S.
Others can take advantage of pathways within the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program that allow people to join their immediate relatives in the U.S.
P1, P2, P3
In early August 2022, the State Department announced new priority eligibility under the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program for Afghans who worked for the U.S. government (P1), or worked for U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations or American news organizations (P2), or have immediate family members in the U.S. who are refugees or asylees (P3).
But even if an Afghan evacuee qualifies for these programs, there is no guarantee they will be approved for resettlement to the United States.
“All applicants must pass extensive security checks and complete an interview with a Department of Homeland Security/US Citizenship and Immigration Services officer,” the State Department website says.
U.S. Refugee Admission Program
The USRAP provides a straightforward path to the refugee resettlement process, but first refugees must, on their own, reach a third country where they can contact the State Department to begin the resettlement process.
Applicants are prescreened at one of a handful of Resettlement Support Centers scattered around the world. This is followed by an interview conducted by a U.S. immigration officer, multiple security checks, and a medical examination to determine their eligibility for resettlement in the United States.
The State Department is managing referrals to the refugee program, but there is no direct contact between an applicant and the U.S. government before an applicant leaves Afghanistan.
It can take the department 12-18 months to process an application, the department’s website says, so applicants would need to live in a third country and support themselves and their families until the case processing is complete.
The third priority category offers access to the refugee program for those whose immediate family members have entered the United States as refugees or were given asylum within the past five years.
Family-based paths
A person with refugee or asylee status in the U.S. can seek “follow-to-join benefits” for their spouse or unmarried children younger than 21, who were not previously given refugee status.
Those who have humanitarian parole status, or were initially paroled into the United States and later received Temporary Protected Status, can also file for their spouse and unmarried children under 21 for entry to the United States as refugees.
Or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents can file a petition for certain relatives to immigrate to the United States.
Through the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Congress established the family immigration procedures we know today.
The law creates a preference system allowing U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents to sponsor immediate relatives, including spouses, unmarried minor children and parents, to immigrate immediately to the U.S. without any numerical limits.
The U.S. citizen or resident files an application that includes a 12-step process within the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and State Department.
Once approved, applicants will receive travel documents to resettle in the United States.
The Department of State funds the international transportation of refugees resettled in the United States through a program administered by the International Organization for Migration.
Refugees are expected to pay back their travel expenses, starting six months after they arrive.
They are also assigned to a sponsoring resettlement agency that provides assistance with services such as housing and employment upon the refugee’s arrival in the U.S.
Under U.S. immigration law, those under refugee status may apply for green cards to become permanent residents after one year in the United States. After five years of permanent residency, they can apply for U.S. citizenship.
Blinken Reiterates U.S. Stance On Taliban Ties: Normalization Hinges On Women’s Rights

Blinken
By RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi
August 15, 2023
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated that there can be no advancement in the relationship between the United States and Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers unless there is an improvement in the treatment of women in the country.
Speaking to reporters on August 15, the two-year anniversary of the Taliban’s seizure of power in Kabul, Blinken said the United States continues to work to hold the Taliban accountable for the commitments that it’s made, particularly when it comes to the rights of women and girls.
“We’ve been very clear with the Taliban — and dozens of countries around the world have been very clear — that the path to any more normal relationship between the Taliban and other countries will be blocked unless and until the rights of women and girls among other things are actually supported,” Blinken said.
No country has recognized the Taliban-led government, and the United States has avoided direct economic engagement in part over the treatment of women and girls, who have seen their rights drastically curbed by the hard-line Islamists. This includes a ban on women working in local and international nongovernmental organizations and a ban on education beyond the sixth grade.
The Taliban stormed back to power in August 2021 after President Joe Biden withdrew U.S. troops under the terms of an agreement reached in February 2020 between the Taliban and the administration of then-U.S. President Donald Trump.
Blinken defended the pullout and said the United States was not focused on other priorities.
“The decision to withdraw from Afghanistan was an incredibly difficult one, but also the right one,” Blinken said. “We ended America’s longest war. For the first time in 20 years, we don’t have another generation of young Americans going to fight and die.”
A number of international human rights organizations earlier on August 15 called the Taliban’s two years of rule shameful and worrying.
Amnesty International and several other international human rights organizations demanded in a statement an effective response to the situation, noting the Taliban’s strict decrees against human rights in Afghanistan, especially against women and girls.
The organizations said in a statement that in the past two years, the Taliban has increasingly imposed harmful policies against women and girls and religious and ethnic minorities that clearly violate Afghanistan’s obligations under international human rights law.
The Taliban has previously rejected reports on the treatment of women as propaganda of international organizations. The militant group’s leaders have said they have strengthened all the rights of women in Afghanistan in light of Islamic principles.
Zabihullah Mujahid, the chief spokesman for the Taliban, said in an interview with the AP marking the second anniversary of the Taliban takeover of the country that the Taliban views its rule of Afghanistan as open-ended and as drawing legitimacy from Islamic law. He also suggested a ban on female education will remain in place.
Female activist Soheila Yousefi calls the situation alarming and wants the world to pay attention.
“The international community should take serious action in this regard because the world chose to be silent in these two years and did not take any practical steps. Our request is that they should look at the current situation in Afghanistan, then take a serious and comprehensive review.”
The Taliban did not respond to Radio Azadi’s questions before the release of the report, but the rulers have spoken of strengthening human rights in Afghanistan, especially the rights of women and girls, according to Islamic principles.
With reporting by AP and AFP
Copyright (c) 2023. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 400, Washington DC 20036.
UN Envoy to ICC: Prosecute Taliban for Banning Girls’ Education
Margaret Besheer
VOA News
August 15, 2023
NEW YORK — The United Nations Special Envoy for Global Education said Tuesday that the International Criminal Court should investigate and pursue charges against the Taliban for their denial of basic rights to Afghan women and girls.
“The legal opinion we have received shows that the denial of education to Afghan girls and employment to Afghan women is gender discrimination, which should count as a crime against humanity, and it should be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court,” Special Envoy Gordon Brown told reporters in a video briefing.
Brown, who served as British prime minister from 2007 to 2010, made the announcement on the second anniversary of the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan.
He said he is in contact with the ICC and has sent court officials the legal opinion. He urged The Hague-based court to investigate and prosecute those responsible.
Brown also urged Muslim nations to send a delegation to Kandahar, Afghanistan, to meet with Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and his close associates to urge them to lift the education and work bans, which have no basis in the Quran or Islam. The supreme leader has shown no sign of reversing the edicts.
“The offer should be made that if schools are reopened under terms that allow girls proper rights and dignity, then the education aid that existed for 20 years that has been cut will now be restored,” Brown said.
Brown echoed other U.N. officials who have said they believe there is a split in thinking within the Taliban regime on restoring education.
“We believe there are many people within the Afghan Education ministry itself, and of course many teachers, who want to get the girls back to school,” he said.
The special envoy offered a five-pronged coordinated approach of applying pressure via the International Criminal Court; sanctioning individuals; sending a Muslim delegation to meet senior leaders; offering education funding; and showing through the continuation of online and underground schools that the regime cannot stop education getting through to its female population.
The Taliban have banned girls from attending schools beyond the sixth grade, blocked female students from accessing university classes, and banned Afghan women from working for the U.N. and other aid groups.
The United Nations has been working to persuade the Taliban to lift many of the 50 edicts, orders and restrictions they have imposed, including the April 5 ban on Afghan women working for the United Nations. About 400 Afghan women work for the organization in the country, and the U.N. has moved them to remote work to try to circumvent the decree.
Uzbek Border Town Adjusts to the Taliban as Neighbors
Navbahor Imamova
VOA News
August 15, 2023
TERMEZ, UZBEKISTAN — Surrounded by orchard trees and flowers, a newly renovated house in Surkhandarya, Uzbekistan, boasts a large courtyard and barn. Sipping green tea in the sweltering summer heat, a group of local women of different ages and backgrounds tell VOA that life near the Afghan border has never been easy, but they now worry more about their neighbors.
Cross-border traffic has fallen since the Taliban takeover in 2021, but dozens of Afghans still enter Uzbekistan daily, and cargo movement at the border crossing is visibly dynamic.
“We see Afghanistan every time we go out. It’s right there,” says Guljamila Hayitova, 72, pointing to the cotton field that ends at the borderline fence.
“Having lived here all my life and still farming in this area, we trust our border forces. We rely on our government, which I know is committed to ensure security. Yet any smoke we see in Hayraton [Afghan border town], any gun shot or blast we hear, does alarm us,” she adds.
With around 3 million people, this southern region of Uzbekistan also borders Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. Nearly 200,000 of its people reside, work and study in Termez, the city on the Afghan border. The Friendship Bridge over the Amu Darya River connects Termez with Hayraton, the northern town of Afghanistan’s Balkh province.
Tashkent’s special representative on Afghanistan, Ismatulla Irgashev, argues that the Taliban, with all their complexities and challenges, “are a reality the neighbors and the international community must accept and deal with, based on mutual interests.”
In recent regional talks that also included U.S. and European envoys, Irgashev and other Uzbek diplomats stressed the “need to provide humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people, while also engaging the leadership in Kabul.”
Tashkent has been pushing for infrastructure projects through Afghanistan so their double-landlocked republic can finally gain access to seaports in South Asia. While experts in Tashkent and elsewhere, including Washington, debate the feasibility of Uzbekistan’s strategic goals regarding the Taliban, who Irgashev describes as “steadily evolving,” people in Termez want more trade and exchange.
Shaman Jumayev’s house and farm overlook the Friendship Bridge. The railway into Afghanistan runs by his property where he lives with his joint family.
“The Taliban takeover has not and will not change the way we live,” Jumayev emphasizes, showing off his teenage grandchildren, who are getting their education in Termez.
“I don’t separate Afghans. Taliban or not, they are all the same for me. We are all quite used to our neighbor, whose conflicts I have watched from here for the last 45 years.”
Jumayev highlights a typical point made by locals in around 70 neighborhoods adjacent to the border: Uzbeks, Afghans and others have lived alongside each other forever, and no politics can ever separate them.
“We can’t wait to see the trade center the Uzbek government aims to open near the crossing point,” said Nasibakhon Abdunazarova, chief of Ayritom, the closest border neighborhood.
“We already benefit from the Termez Cargo Center, where dozens of our men work. Our youth need opportunities and are eager to be employed by new businesses that pay better,” she said.
But the salary at the Termez Cargo Center is modest, Hayitova points out, discussing the impact of the giant terminal that opened in 2016. “But it is still better than having nothing here,” which was the situation until recently.
Located near the border, the cargo center has the capacity to serve up to 50 trucks at a time, offering customs clearance, storage of import-export cargo, and transit of rail and auto-delivered products to and from Afghanistan. It also runs the Karvonsaroy hotel complex.
Jumayev and others interviewed by VOA in Surkhandarya worry about the new channel the Taliban is building off the Amu Darya River.
“We cannot underestimate the need for water. I don’t sense any panic here over this project, but we definitely don’t want to suffer from any scarcity because of it,” Abdunazarova says.
Jumayev, whose farm relies on the Amu Darya, is happy with how Tashkent is handling the issue.
“The Taliban knows our position, because the Uzbek government has laid out our concerns,” he says.
Confident about security
For Surkhandarya Governor Ulugbek Qosimov, “Trade, education and cultural ties with the Afghan people have continued even during the most unstable times on the other side of the Amu Darya.”
“Our people are accustomed to stability and peace, despite what happens in Afghanistan. We have not had any crisis in the area since the Taliban took over,” he said.
Uzbekistan does not accept refugees from Afghanistan. Officials tell VOA that those who entered before the Taliban came to power have mostly been allowed to stay. Many Afghan traders have been able to extend residential permits, while some have been waiting for a long time.
“I feel much safer now with my family here than I did two years ago when the leadership changed in Kabul,” says Nadim, an Afghan citizen who faced deportation in 2021 and asked to withhold his last name for safety reasons.
The Afghan consulate in Termez has renewed its office — a Taliban official now represents Kabul. But since his government is not recognized, the old flag still flies outside the compound.
Termez hosts a special school for Afghan citizens, educating 535 so far. More than half have gotten undergraduate degrees.
“Six years ago, there were about 40 Afghan businesses in Termez. Now, we have more than 300 engaged in construction, agriculture, services and manufacturing,” Qosimov says.
Uzbekistan President Shavkat Mirziyoyev set Afghanistan as a foreign policy priority, focusing on security, development and partnership.
Guided by that strategy, Qosimov says, “All we want is prosperity, here and across the border. We have been assisting our neighbors with food, clothing and other critical necessities. We have also been increasing incentives for Afghan entrepreneurs.”
C5+1
In a July 27 meeting, under the auspices of the C5+1 regional diplomatic platform, special envoys for Afghanistan from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and the United States emphasized a precondition to the Taliban: “An inclusive, united, sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Afghanistan that is free of terrorism, respects the rights of its population, including women and girls, and is at peace with itself and its neighbors.”
The group underlined that the Afghan territory should not be “used as a base for hosting, financing, or exporting terrorism and violent extremism to other countries,” agreeing that countries must strengthen cooperation against trafficking in people, arms and illegal drugs.
A stable and prosperous Afghanistan “is only attainable if all Afghans, including women and girls, and persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, can fully, equally, and meaningfully participate in — and contribute to — the country’s future,” the joint statement said.
Reaffirming the importance of regional connectivity through the construction of energy infrastructure and transportation networks connecting Central Asia to South Asia via Afghanistan, C5+1 is supporting United Nations efforts and presence in Afghanistan, urging for responsible and inclusive governance.
Taliban Mark August 15 ‘Victory Day’ Against US

Taliban militants (file photo)
Ayaz Gul
VOA News
August 14, 2023
ISLAMABAD — Afghanistan’s Taliban have declared August 15 the day of “victory” against the United States and announced a public holiday for Tuesday to mark the second anniversary of their return to power in Kabul.
The then-insurgent Taliban captured the capital on August 15, 2021, after overrunning the rest of the war-torn South Asian nation as the last remaining U.S.-led NATO troops withdrew, ending their two decades of involvement in the Afghan war.
“Tuesday is the victory day of the jihad [holy war] of the people of Afghanistan under the leadership of Islamic Emirate against the United States and its allies,” stated an announcement by the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs on the eve of the anniversary.
The Taliban government, the Islamic Emirate, relies on its strict interpretation of Islamic law, or Sharia, to rule the poverty-stricken South Asian nation.
No foreign country has yet granted legitimacy to the de facto Afghan authorities, citing restrictions on most women’s access to work, and a ban on girls’ education, and other human rights concerns.
“It is time for the United States and others to formally recognize our government because it is the right of the people of Afghanistan, and withholding it is not a positive step,” Zabihullah Mujahid told VOA in an interview ahead of Tuesday’s celebrations.
“Women’s education and work is not the issue. These are mere excuses,” Mujahid asserted, speaking from his office in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar. “Unfortunately, accepting an Islamic government is difficult for the Western world or countries defeated in Afghanistan, so they are not ready to recognize us.”
The United Nations has indefinitely postponed international recognition of the Taliban government.
Mujahid said their Islamic Emirate had met all the requirements over the past two years to become part of the global community.
He recounted the Taliban had established nationwide peace and security, stabilized the economy, ended illegal opium poppy cultivation as well as its trafficking, ensured women’s rights to inheritance, and engaged in commercial activities in line with Sharia.
“We maintain formal ties with several countries. Our visits to and cooperation with them through diplomacy are all formal. We have opened Afghan embassies in many countries, and their embassies operate in Kabul. Our official business, trade, and exchange of delegations take place with them,” Mujahid said.
“We consider it a formal acceptance of the Islamic Emirate, and we are no longer concerned about this issue.” He renewed the demand for Western nations to unfreeze nearly $9 billion in Afghan central bank assets, mostly held in the U.S., and to lift travel restrictions on top Taliban leaders.
Mujahid alleged that American drones still occasionally violate Afghan airspace. He demanded an end to the alleged violations.
Taliban forces have ended terrorism, and they are determined to prevent anyone, including Afghans, from threatening the United States or any other country from Afghanistan, he said.
“Those found guilty of indulging in such activities will be brought to justice and punished in line with our legal system.”
Mujahid claimed that sustained Taliban counterterrorism operations had almost “decimated Daesh and its bases” in the country. He used the local name for the regional affiliate of the Islamic State terrorist group, known as the Islamic State Khorasan Province.
In a recent round of talks with Taliban representatives, U.S. delegates urged them to reverse policies responsible for the deteriorating Afghan human rights situation, particularly for women and girls. The dialogue occurred in Doha, Qatar, from July 30-31.
“U.S. officials took note of the Taliban’s continuing commitment to not allow the territory of Afghanistan to be used by anyone to threaten the United States and its allies, and the two sides discussed Taliban efforts to fulfill security commitments,” the State Department said after the meeting.
It noted reports indicating that the Taliban’s ban on opium poppy cultivation resulted in a significant decrease in cultivation during the most recent growing season.
Taliban have banned girls from attending schools beyond the sixth grade, blocked female students from accessing university classes, and banned Afghan women from working for the U.N. and other aid groups in a country where two-thirds of the population need humanitarian aid.
While the hard-line leaders have touted their gains since reclaiming power two years ago, the United Nations and other global monitors have consistently decried worsening human rights conditions in Afghanistan.
CIVICUS, a South Africa-based global alliance of civil society organizations and activists, in its report on the two-year Taliban rule, criticized them for unleashing a “systematic assault on civic space.”
“The Taliban have continued to crackdown on protests over the last year, especially by women’s rights activists around their right to education and employment with some arbitrarily arrested and ill-treated,” the report said.
“Activists have been arbitrarily arrested and detained for their criticism of the Taliban,” the global alliance said. “Others have faced harassment, intimidation, and violence, and some have been killed.”
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has called on the Taliban to stop their “relentless campaign of media intimidation” and abide by its promise to protect journalists in the country.
“Two years after the Taliban takeover, Afghanistan’s once vibrant free press is a ghost of its former self,” Beh Lih Yi, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator, said Monday.
“Worsening media repression is isolating Afghanistan from the rest of the world at a time when the country is grappling with one of the world’s largest humanitarian emergencies.”
She stressed that access to reliable and trustworthy information could help save lives and livelihoods in a crisis, “but the Taliban’s escalating crackdown on media is doing the opposite.”
Press freedom monitors say about a dozen journalists are imprisoned in Afghanistan for their work. Most were rounded up over the past two weeks, including three Sunday.
The Taliban’s spy agency, the General Directorate of Intelligence, is allegedly the driving force behind the crackdown. Government media spokespersons rarely comment on the agency’s crackdown.
Despite initially promising to allow press freedom after taking power two years ago, the Taliban have shut down dozens of local media outlets, banned some international broadcasters, and denied visas to foreign correspondents, the CPJ noted in its statement.
“In the last two years, hundreds of Afghan journalists have fled to neighboring countries like Pakistan and Iran, and many are now stuck in legal limbo without clear prospects of resettlement to a third country,” the U.S.-based media freedom monitor said.
Related
Tolo News in Dari – August 15, 2023
The Taliban’s Dilemma: Balancing Ties with TTP and Pakistan
8am: Contrary to previous expectations, the Taliban’s control over Afghanistan did not bring happiness to Pakistan. This is due to an increase in terrorist activities carried out by Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) against Pakistan’s interests from Afghanistan. On July 20, Khawaja Muhammad Asif, the Pakistani Minister of Defense, acknowledged that Pakistan had initially expressed appreciation to the Taliban for their victory in the long-standing conflict. However, Pakistan was unaware that the Taliban would provide shelter to its adversaries. On July 19, Asif Durrani, Pakistan’s special representative for Afghanistan affairs, visited Kabul for three days to deliver an important message from the Pakistani government to the Taliban regarding the need to suppress TTP. Click here to read more (external link).
Related
