Ayaz Gul
VOA News / November 30, 2017
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan says high-level discussions “away from public glare” are under way with the United States to bridge differences stemming from the new Afghan strategy U.S. President Donald Trump announced in August.
Pakistan did not agree with the U.S. policy because “there was a difference in understanding and perceptions on both sides,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Faisal Thursday, while discussing the dialogue process at his weekly news conference in Islamabad.
The policy focused on Pakistan’s alleged duplicity; receiving billions of dollars in U.S. assistance as a non-NATO ally for combating regional terrorism and covertly supporting the Taliban and the Haqqani terrorist network waging deadly attacks on Afghan and U.S.-led allied forces in Afghanistan.
Islamabad promptly rejected the accusations, saying the country is being scapegoated for U.S. military failures in stabilizing Afghanistan and defeating the Taliban.
“Pakistan and the U.S. are actively engaged in discussing the situation in Afghanistan with a view to arriving at a better understanding of each other’s positions and to devise the way forward, to promote peace and stability in Afghanistan,” Faisal said.
The spokesman also said U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis will continue the interaction during a trip to Islamabad. He did not say when, but the Pentagon chief will be visiting the country on December 3, according to Pakistani Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif. The Pentagon has not confirmed the date.
U.S. officials are also critical of alleged ties between the Pakistani spy agency, ISI, and the Haqqani network, whose leaders are accused of directing violence in Afghanistan from their alleged sanctuaries in Pakistan.
The top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, General John Nicholson, on Thursday told reporters Washington is in talks with Islamabad to press the latter to cut those ties.
“This is a conversation that is going on between Washington and Islamabad at the highest levels of the U.S. government. So, I would not talk about the next steps that we will take. But you can be assured that my government, the United States, is putting pressure on Pakistan, this is diplomatic pressure, economic pressure,” Nicholson said.
The U.S. general cited a deadly truck bombing he said the Haqqani network plotted in the high-security diplomatic zone of the Afghan capital, Kabul, in May of this year. The attack left more than 150 people dead and many more wounded. Embassies of nine countries were also damaged, according to Nicholson.
“They [the Haqqanis] are not only attacking innocent Afghan people, they have also been attacking the international forces and diplomats that are here to help the Afghan people. So, all of these nations have been going back to Pakistan,” noted the general.
While testifying before a congressional committee in October, Mattis said the U.S. would try “one more time” to make the Afghan strategy work with Pakistan, “and if our best efforts fail, the president is prepared to take whatever steps are necessary.”
Pakistani officials maintain that their counterterrorism efforts have reduced the threat in the region and the country is not supporting any warring faction in Afghanistan.
Pakistan says camps set up for millions of Afghan refugees have been used as shelters by insurgents to plot attacks on both sides of the border. Islamabad does not rule out the presence of Afghan insurgents on its side.
They say unleashing a counter-militancy operation on the displaced population would amount to bringing the Afghan war to Pakistani soil at a time when the country is already fighting anti-state militants.
Critics, however, rule out a total collapse in bilateral relations over persistent tensions. They point to major ground and air lines of communications through Pakistan that have been used for years to send supplies to thousands of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.
More Security News
Very interesting !
.
They have been using the subjugated civilian and military organs of Pakistan all along, since the grand invasion of Afghanistan; but, it is obviously, (after such a long time), has not produced produced the results have to the liking of the war criminals and international
“thugs and thug-mars”
.
Alll along they have exercised the savageries with impunity and got exoneration from goofy highly-paid judges who were suppose to raise their honest voices.international.
.
.
.
It is set at a desperate junction with no proper exit routes for the invaders to save face.
.
.
.
My advice:
.
JUST SPOLAGIZE AND GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN!
.
.
.
*Pakistani puppet did did their best; I guess, it has not been good enough and never will be.
* *•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*• *•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•
*
“AN INTERNATIONAL PEACE CONFERENCE” : *****
*ON
“AFGHANISTAN”
************************************
************************************ * * * * * ***** AN IMMEDIATELY URGENT * NEED FOR AN INTERNATIONAL * “PEACE CONFERENCE” ON AFGHANISTAN: * > * > * > * > * > * * WE URGE ALL * THE SAVAGE * INVADERS; PROFITEERS; WAR CRIMINALS; MEGA-LA-MANIACS AND WARMONGERS TO: IMMEDIATELY LEAVE THE PEOPLE OF AFGHANISTAN ALONE * * LET THEM BUILD UP
THEIR OWN COUNTRY * AND * THE SHATTERED
LIVES !
************************************
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• * * * * *
************* THE “KEY ATTENDEES”: * *********** MUST INCLUDE REPRESENTATIONS FROM THE FOLLOWING HISTORICALLY AND REGIONALLY ESSENTIAL COUNTRIES AND INFLUENTIAL INTERNATIONAL BODIES : * • * • * • 1- All the resistance forces in Afghanistan * 2- NATO ALLIANCE * 3- All neighboring countries of Afghanistan. * 4- Turkey, India and Saudi Arabia. * 5- Also, active participation and observation of United Nations and Vatican would definitely enhance the prospects for a mutually respectful and impartial resolution.
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * We must collectively command a cessation to all hostilities and an end to this savagely-conducted “INTERNATIONALLY-IMPOSED CONFLICT” in Afghanistan.
————————————– * * * * *
************************************
************************************
————————————– * BROTHERS AND SISTERS ! * * WE MUST STOP THIS SAVAGELY-MANIPULATIVE STATE OF WARFARES; EXPLOITATIVE MILITARY BONANZAS * AND * CONTINUATION OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHT * VIOLATIONS. ** * WE ARE 100% SURE THAT A RESPECTFUL AND PEACEFUL ENVIRONMENT, FOR ALL THE PEOPLE OF AFGHANISTAN IS POSSIBLE. ***** * ONLY IF “THE CRIMINAL INVADERS” * GET “ ENTIRELY OUT OF * THE COUNTRY * * * * *
************************************
————————————– * PLEASE; SHOW YOUR ”HONORABLE SUPPORT” !
************************************
This a poem from the
“great Sunnah-e”, (1080-1141),
of Ghazni- he had profound impact on all later
Islamic Renaissance Period poets.
.
.
درویش نیم اگرچه کم میکوشم
I am not a “Darwashe”; even tough I try a little.
دیوانه نیم اگرچه گم شد هوشم
I am not crazy; even though, I may have lost some of my wits
.
.
گر بیبرگی به مرگ مالد گوشم
If poverty strikes, (alarms), the end of my life on my ear lobes
آزادی را به بندگی نفروشم
Even then, I would not sell my liberty
to slavery
A little revised:
.
.
Couplets from
“great Sunnah-e”, (1080-1141),
of Ghazni- he had profound impact on all subsequent
Islamic Renaissance Period poets.
.
.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
***************
•••••••
****
••
•
درویش نیم اگرچه کم میکوشم
I am not a pious hermit (Darwaish); even tough I try a little (here and there).
دیوانه نیم اگرچه گم شد هوشم
I am not crazy; even though, I may have lost some of my wits (memory).
.
.
گر بیبرگی به مرگ مالد گوشم
If (extreme) poverty strikes, (alarms), the end of life on my ear drums (lobes)
زادی را به بندگی نفروشمt
(Even then), I would not sell
liberty to slavery.