December 11, 2018
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani authorities are scrutinizing media coverage of a Pashtun nationalist movement, blocking VOA websites and filing police cases against journalists covering local rallies.
Sailaab Mehsud of RFE/RL’s Mashaal radio and Zafar Wazir of a local TV channel were identified in a police report as participants in a protest rally Saturday in Dera Ismael Khan in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province along with nearly 20 other people. Police alleged they were chanting slogans against state institutions and inciting the public to violence.
Mehsud said he and Wazir were covering the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement rally as journalists.
About a week earlier, Pakistan ordered internet service providers to block the website of Voice of America’s Urdu language service. VOA’s Deewa news website, which primarily caters to the Pashto-speaking audience in the region around the Afghan border, has already been blocked for months.
Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry claimed the sites were blocked for “false and prejudiced reporting.”
“The stories they were doing were only projecting a particular narrative without any impartial view. There are many things happening in our country and most are positive,” he said.
While Chaudhry did not elaborate, an intelligence source told a VOA reporter on condition of anonymity that the decision to block the website was triggered by VOA’s coverage of PTM. The rights movement has a tense relationship with Pakistan’s military.
Rights violations alleged
Leaders of PTM contend that Pakistan’s military is involved in human rights violations linked to its efforts to rid the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region of militant groups. Around 200,000 Pakistani troops are deployed in the region to “secure and control militant violence,” according to military spokesman Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor.
PTM also says that the military supports and protects certain militant groups even as it carries out clearing operations against others — a charge the military strongly denies. One of the movement’s slogans, chanted often in its rallies, “yeh jo dehshat gardi hai, iss ke peechai wardi hai,” which means “The military uniform is behind this terrorism.”
U.S. and Afghan officials routinely accuse Pakistani officials of supporting banned terror groups, but such accusations are rarely voiced by Pakistanis. That partly accounts for the close scrutiny of the group, which was warned again last week by Pakistan’s military spokesman.
In a news conference Ghafoor said the state had so far taken a soft stance on PTM because of a realization that its members had suffered from 15 years of war. However, he warned PTM leaders to not cross “the line where the state may have to use force to control the situation.” He did not specify what constituted that line.
Nafees Takar, the head of VOA’s Deewa service, defended his service’s coverage of PTM activities as journalistically warranted and balanced.
“We bring in ministers, government officials and military statements on Twitter and the official website of ISPR [the public relations wing of the military] for balancing the PTM coverage,” he said.
Urdu service chief Kokab Farshori said PTM was an important story for his audience as well, but denied that the coverage was prejudiced.
“We regularly interview government officials and ministers. A recent press conference by the military spokesman was our lead story. So, to say we have not been balanced is not true,” he said.
Internet users in Pakistan started reporting they could not access VOA Urdu’s website a day after a news conference held by PTM leader Mohsin Dawar that the service covered and streamed live on Facebook.
PTM’s activities seem to receive little news coverage in the otherwise vibrant Pakistani media.
Even though the government did not give specific examples of what it means to say VOA has been projecting a “particular narrative,” the international broadcaster has occasionally drawn criticism from some independent journalists.
Zarrar Khuhro, the co-host of a television news show known for its independent and often critical reporting, went on Twitter to criticize VOA Deewa’s coverage of a small protest in Washington this year. He accused the broadcaster of acting as “a propaganda outlet” after reporters covered a protest by what he called “four people and a placard” who named themselves the Free Karachi Movement.
Other Twitter users defended Deewa’s coverage and Khuhro himself praised the broadcaster for its reporting on other issues.
“There is of course a great deal of stuff that they cover that the mainstream media in Pakistan for one reason or the other cannot cover,” he said.
VOA is funded by the U.S. government, often creating a perception that the government dictates the news organization’s editorial decisions. However, VOA is required by law to report objectively and is protected by an editorial “firewall” from government interference.
Freedom of expression in Pakistan
The government’s order blocking VOA websites comes at a time when activists say freedom of expression in Pakistan is under attack.
A Committee to Protect Journalists report issued in September noted that “measures to stomp out terrorism in the country have gone hand in hand with increased pressure on the media. The military bars access to certain areas, uses direct and indirect acts of intimidation, and even allegedly instigates violence against reporters to prevent critical reporting.”
The report acknowledged that fewer journalists had been killed in retaliation for their work in recent years.
A study produced this year by Pakistani rights group Media Matters for Democracy found that “almost 88 percent of the journalist respondents claimed they had committed self-censorship in their professional news reporting. Around 79 percent said they had also self-censored their personal expression online.”
The military spokesman denied that his office wanted critics silenced. Information Minister Chaudhry denied there was any censorship, self or otherwise.
“Media in Pakistan is responsible and independent rather more than many other countries,” he said. He called media the “fourth pillar” of state and said, “They are doing a great job.”
Senior Pakistani journalist Imtiaz Alam disagreed with the minister, saying the role of the military had expanded significantly. “They are now minutely monitoring the media with very detailed instructions,” he said.
“I know because I worked there. They used to monitor our show. It happens to other TV channels as well as newspapers. My friends are editors — they give me all the details,” he added.
Rights activists complain that space for freedom of expression is shrinking outside mainstream media as well.
Last month, controversy erupted at a literary festival in Lahore when several panelists were dropped at the last minute. Responding to queries about the decision, one of the organizers, Salima Hashmi, said:
“We left an empty chair on the stage to remind people that when Zia-ul-Haq was the president of this country and there was censorship, the newspapers … published empty columns on the pages where the news should’ve been. And the inference is quite clear.”
Haq, a military dictator, held power in Pakistan from 1977 to his death in 1988.
A digital platform called safenewsrooms.org that was launched by Pakistani journalist Taha Siddiqui, who was forced to flee Pakistan after an attempted abduction, was blocked within weeks of its launch. Siddiqui is a strong critic of Pakistan’s military.